7/24/2023 0 Comments Young models in heels![]() One example is the model of a single long-term relationship combined with several concurring extra-marital affairs. Buss (1994) claims that people show a remarkable measure of creativity when it comes to their reproduction strategies. The parental investment theory ( Trivers, 1972) has however, been repeatedly criticized by psychologists on several grounds. ![]() ![]() One of the ways for females to achieve this according to Prokop and Švancárová (2020) is beautification, as exemplified by wearing high heels. According to these sources, parental investment constitutes a basis for female competition over a potential sexual partner. The theoretical foundation of the original paper ( Prokop and Švancárová, 2020) is based on the premise that “human females invest in offspring more than males” (supported by references to Eibl-Eibesfeldt, 1989 Hewlett, 1992 Geary, 2000) and “human males, on the other hand, spend more time caring for their offspring than males of virtually all other mammals” ( Bjorklund and Shackelford, 1999 Puts, 2010). Our aim was to gain deeper insights beyond the simple forced choice response used in the original study. Our intention was to explore the narratives of similar young women ( N = 21 years, SD = 4.67 in the original study) that relate to dating and beautification. We used qualitative methods to explore how young women view dating events, with focusing in particular on themes associated with the phenomenon of beautification. Our study was designed to open up alternative explanations, based on psychological, rather than biological approaches. However, the study design is based on participants imagining having an interaction with one of two different photographs (attractive/unattractive mele) and choosing one of two kinds of footwear (as shown on a photographs (high heels and low heels). They observed that when female participants imagined an interaction with an attractive male, their preference for high heels steeply increased. In their paper, Prokop and Švancárová (2020) claim that wearing high heels operates as a form of sexual signaling by females in intersexual interactions. We conclude that the relationship between the tendency to use beautification and attractiveness of a potential partner is far from straightforward and relying on binary responses to hypothetical scenarios does not provide convincing evidence. Moreover, young women tend to use beautification with caution. Our data interpretation from these two sources suggests that young women tend to see dates as social events not necessarily leading to sex that they do not regard high heel shoes as a means of beautification and that they take account of practical considerations when getting dressed up for a date. We also used the photo elicitation methodology to observe what footwear our participants own. For our study we followed principles of Thematic Analysis to identify the key themes in the narratives related to dating and beautification. We conducted ten focus groups ( N = 50), recruiting from a similar sample of participants to those in the original study. In addition to proposing hypothetical dating scenarios, as in the original study, we also asked participants about how they went about getting ready to go on a date, the significance of dating to them, and their thinking behind choosing particular outfits for a date. The present paper revisits this study through a psychological standpoint, rather than a biological one. ![]() The authors concluded that wearing high heels seem to be a form of sexual signaling by females in intersexual interactions. The 2020 study entitled ‘Wearing high heels as female mating strategy’ by Pavol Prokop and Jana Švancárová claimed that when females imagined an interaction with an attractive male, their preference for high heels steeply increased, compared with an imagined interaction with an unattractive male.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |